Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1915No. 18,945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This court reversed the judgment of the trial court in the above entitled cause and the remittitur was transmitted to and filed in that court. Plaintiff now applies to this court to direct the trial court to make new and amended findings of fact and render judgment in his favor without a new trial. This application must be denied for the reason that, when the remittitur was filed in the lower court, the jurisdiction of this court over the cause came to an end. Rud v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Pope County, 66 Minn. 358, 68 N. W. 1062, 69 N. W. 886. It appears from the moving papers that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rud v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Mahoney v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Lawton v. FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Farmers Merchants State Bank of Hawley v. MellumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Nason v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API