Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Beatty
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by W. W. Beatty against the Chicago, Rock Island ■& Pacific Railway Company. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITPI, C.
This was an action to re•cover damages charged to have been sustained on account of the failure of the railway company to furnish cars within a reasonable time, as agreed by the terms of an oral contract entered into between the plaintiff and the station agent, for the shipment of ■cotton seed from Verden, Okla., to Chickasha, Ind. T., and on account of the failure to furnish said cars the seed spoiled, and the loss claimed resulted to the plaintiff. Two causes of action were declared upon. The material part of the first count of the amended petition, upon which the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Clegg v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. DobynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Schaff v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.