Saylor v. Brady
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Labette district court; Elmer C. Clark, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action for damages for malpractice. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, and she appealed.
Plaintiff offered no expert evidence to show negligence. It is the general rule in malpractice cases that the negligence in the treat*765ment, which it is claimed caused the injury, must be shown by physicians or by medical witnesses called as experts. Pettigrew v. Lewis, 46 Kan. 78, 26 Pac. 458; Sly v. Powell, 87 Kan. 142, 123 Pac. 881; Stout v. Bowers, 97 Kan. 33, 154 Pac. 259; Paulich v. Nipple, 104 Kan. 801, 180 Pac.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Sly v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Paulich v. NippleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Riggs v. GouldnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- McMillen v. FoncannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Pierce v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.