Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Edgerton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1940No. 34,474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action for damages for malpractice. Plaintiff has appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to his evidence.

The negligence and the consequences thereof, as alleged, were as follows:

“That on the 24th day of October, 1937, this plaintiff suffered a right traumatic direct inguinal hernia, and on the 25th day of October, 1937, the defendant herein, holding himself out as a surgeon to this plaintiff, the plaintiff employed defendant at his request as such surgeon, to operate and cure said hernia and to attend this plaintiff until…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. ExonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Boxberger v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Kinzie v. New Gottland TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API