Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Edgerton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 27, 1940No. 34,474PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This was an action for damages for malpractice. Plaintiff has appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to his evidence.
The negligence and the consequences thereof, as alleged, were as follows:
“That on the 24th day of October, 1937, this plaintiff suffered a right traumatic direct inguinal hernia, and on the 25th day of October, 1937, the defendant herein, holding himself out as a surgeon to this plaintiff, the plaintiff employed defendant at his request as such surgeon, to operate and cure said hernia and to attend this plaintiff until…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. ExonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Boxberger v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Kinzie v. New Gottland TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940