Legal Opinion
Farasat v. Paulikas
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 5, 1998No. CIV. H-97-1488PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge.
In this civil action, plaintiff Shahed Farasat (“Farasat”) is seeking compensatory damages and other relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 from his former employers and from a former supervisor. Named as defendants in this ease are Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”), CTF Management Corporation (“CTF”), and Debbie Paulikas' (“Paulikas”). Farasat, who is Iranian, asserts that his employment as a Banquet Captain at the Renaissance Harborplace Hotel (the “Hotel”) was terminated because of his Middle Eastern race, in violation of § 1981.
P…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. DOLE FOOD CO., INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Mungro v. Giant Food, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Mathews v. Giant Food, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Kendrick v. Carter Bank & Trust, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024