Legal Opinion

Estate of Orlando v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 26, 2010No. 09-702TPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This ease involves the April 5, 2005 Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) assessment of the penalty provided by 26 U.S.C. § 6672 (1998) (“Section 6672”)1 against “Michael Or*288lando, deceased.” The plaintiff in this case is the Estate of Michael Orlando (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Orlando’s estate”). The complaint seeks recovery of the penalty imposed on Michael Orlando as a responsible party because he served as the president of a company that failed to pay employment taxes. Pending before the court is the motion of the defendant, the United States (“the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brady v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  2. Ferguson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Cadrecha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Palm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API