Legal Opinion
Palm v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 5, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00904Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
oRf0fNAl, Iln t\t @ndtrb $.tatts [,ourt of felers[ @luimg No. 13-9047 (Filed: June 5,2014) FILED t *,1' t *,t {. *,1' *' !* *,k * * *' * * * * :t,*'1. *'* * * {. * * {( *,} {, {.,1' JUN - 5 2014 MICHAEL NICHOLAS PALM. SR. Plaintiff, #3i#&l'!h v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. * * *,* * r( * :1. :t't * * *'1. *,* *,* * * {. ** :1. * {. i,t *,t * * * i. * * * OPINION and ORDER DAMICH, Senior Judge: Michael Palm ("Plaintiff'), here appearingpro se, filed his Complaint on November 12,2013, seeking a refund from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for partial payments made towards tax assessments…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Crockett, Don W. v. Abraham, SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Estate of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010