Legal Opinion
Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of Camas
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 17, 1999No. 23225-1-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
This case involves a challenge to a city’s open space set-aside ordinance and to a city requirement that a developer construct a secondary access road as a condition of approval for its subdivision application. The superior court found that the road requirement violated due process and RCW 64.40 and that the set-aside ordinance provided for an unconstitutional taking. The City of Camas appeals.
Because there is no evidence that the set-aside ordinance is roughly proportional to the impact of the proposed development, we agree that it is constitutionally defective. But the record does indicate…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Pilcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Pilcher v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- J.L. Storedahl & Sons, Inc. v. Cowlitz CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- United Development Corp. v. City of Mill CreekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.