Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This is an action of assumpsit by the plaintiff corporation for the recovery of rent alleged to be due under a written lease. At the trial, binding instructions were granted for the plaintiff and a verdict rendered against the defendant. After the refusal of the court below to enter judgment n. o. v. in favor of the defendant or grant a new trial, defendant appealed.
Plaintiff owns and operates a cooperative apartment house, tenancy in which is restricted to persons owning stock in the plaintiff corporation. On June 11,1926, the defendant purchased sixty-five shares…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edgerton v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Boreel v. . LawtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- City of New York v. Pike Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hoeveler v. Fleming & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Leiferman v. OstenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kuriger v. CramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Solomon v. Neisner Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Mayer v. Chelten Avenue Building Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Thompson v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Walnut-Juniper Co. v. McKee, Berger & Mansueto, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.