Johnson v. Buckel
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Attachment suit by Charles Johnson against Peter Buckel. From an order granting a motion to vacate the attachment, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The attachment recites that the action is brought to recover the sum of $14,972 as damages for breach of an express contract other than a contract to marry, and states the ground of the attachment to be that “the defendant has removed, disposed of, assigned, and secreted, and is about to remove, dispose of, assign, and secrete, his property, with the intent and design of defrauding his creditors.” The Code, § 636, requires, before procuring the warrant upon this ground, that it should be shown that the defendant “has assigned, disposed of, or secreted, or is about to assign, dispose of, or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kibbe v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cronin v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hale v. BroteNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Jurgens v. SudenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Atlas Furniture Co. v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Garson v. BrumbergNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.