Kibbe v. Herman
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Henry R. Kibbe and others obtained an attachment against Rosalie Herman and another on the ground of fraudulent disposition of defendants’ property. From an order refusing to vacate the attachment Henry S. Manning, defendants’ receiver, appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.
The attachment in this case was issued on the ground that the-defendants had fraudulently disposed of their property with intent to defraud their creditors. The motion to vacate it was made upon the papers upon which it was granted. Three affidavits were presented for the consideration of the court,—one of them made by Edward J. Chaffee, another by Lionel R. Geisenberger, and the other by John J. Morris. Mr. Chaffee, one of the plaintiffs, states that prior to the 2d May, 1887, the defendants were engaged in the business of manufacturing cloaks, etc., in this city; that the defendant Rosalie…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. BuckelNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- V. G. Pfluke Co. v. PapuliasNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Atlas Furniture Co. v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Stein v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1890