Hale v. Brote
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Edgar F. Hale and others against John B. Brote and .others. From an order vacating and setting aside an attachment theretofore granted, plaintiffs appeal.
1Per curiam
It appears upon the face of the attachment that it was issued upon the ground that the defendants have disposed of their property, and are about to dispose of their property, with intent to cheat and defraud their creditors. It is manifest that,, if the defendants have disposed of their property, they could not be about to dispose of it, and that the plaintiffs have not complied with the provision of the Code in stating the ground upon which the attachment was issued. It is impossible for us to tell upon which ground the plaintiffs intended to rely, or which ground it is-claimed by them their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. BuckelNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quail v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Steinhardt v. TurkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1896