Legal Opinion

Molinar v. Plains Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 21, 1983No. 07-82-0042-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Daniel Molinar seeks reversal of a judgment decreeing his liability for attorney’s fees on counterclaims to his alleged, but later voluntarily nonsuited cause of action under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), 1 one of his nonsuited causes of action founded on a breach of contract action and containing an action for violation of the Texas Insurance Code. 2 In essence, Molinar contends, first, that the trial court erred in overruling his pre-nonsuit motions (1) to strike late-filed amended answers and the counterclaims and (2) for a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hernandez v. HeldenfelsTexas Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Santerre v. Agip Petroleum Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  2. Rexrode v. Bazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. Alvarado v. Hyundai Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Urbish v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Guaranty County Mutual Insurance Co. v. ReynaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API