Legal Opinion
Niagara Fire Insurance Company v. Curtsinger
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 2, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commisssioner.
The appellant, Niagara Fire Insurance Company, on October 5, 1957, issued a general and comprehensive policy of insurance on a new dwelling of the appellees, William and Katherine Curtsinger, located in Tay-lorsville. Among other indemnities were those for direct loss or damage by “Collapse of the building or any part thereof,” and by “Landslide” (both with irrelevant exceptions). This action was brought to recover for damage to the property allegedly within those coverages. The main issue in the case was and is whether there was a loss or damage to the building caused…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Skelly v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Streipe v. Liberty Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- M. Nugent v. General Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Old Colony Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olmstead v. Lumbermens Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Doheny West Homeowners' Ass'n v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Higgins v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Eaglestein v. Pacific National Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.