Atterholt v. Herbst
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for Rehearing
BOEHM, Justice.
Under cireumstances spelled out in the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act, the Act limits the liability of a health care provider and permits recovery of excess damages from the Patient's Compensation Fund. In this ease, our original opinion summarized our holding as follows:
when a claimant seeks excess damages from the Patient's Compensation Fund after obtaining a judgment or settlement from a health care provider in a medical malpractice case, the Fund may introduce evidence of the claimant's preexisting risk of harm if it is relevant to establish the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Atterholt v. HerbstIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kovach v. Caligor MidwestIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Bules v. Marshall CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- John Green v. Stephen Robertson, Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Indiana Department of Insurance, Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. EverhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Cutter v. HerbstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.