Legal Opinion

Merrell v. Bay County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 15, 1989No. 4:87-cv-40124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHURCHILL, District Judge.

This case, which involves a procedural due process claim, requires the Court to determine whether a public employee can assert a property interest in his job based upon a Toussaint contract. See Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 408 Mich. 579, 292 N.W.2d 880 (1980). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff Merrell can claim a property interest in his job based on his Toussaint contract, the Court must also decide whether Merrell is entitled to partial summary judgment concerning liability on his procedural due process claim. Finally,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thorin v. Bloomfield Hills Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Willoughby v. Village of DexterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. Rose Walton and John Walton v. State of Michigan, State Judicial Council, and Judge Adam A. ShakoorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Bennett v. Marshall Public LibraryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  5. Fruman v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API