Legal Opinion
United States v. Eduardo Ignancio Munio
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 15, 1990No. 89-5453PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Per curiam
This sentencing guidelines case involves first, whether a district court may rely on offense conduct not charged in an indictment to enhance a defendant’s sentence under the relevant conduct provision, U.S. S.G. § 1B1.3, and second, whether it is appropriate for a district court to apply the preponderance of the evidence standard to offense conduct used to enhance defendant’s sentence. Because we agree with the district court’s disposition of this case, we affirm.
FACTS
In mid November, 1988, appellant gave an informant employed by the Secret Service four counterfeit “sample” notes. On November…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Thurnell Alston, Ervin BrennonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jose Rafael Perez-FrancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Galo Eduardo SarastiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Leonardo Mendoza-Cecelia, Terry Lee Greenberg, Hector Favio Marin-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Dewey M. HamakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Vladimir Cedano-RojasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.