Legal Opinion
United States v. Lawrence
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 23, 1995No. Nos. 92-6687, 92-6688 and 92-6704PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:
Appellants Patrick McQueen, Dwight Gregory Lawrence, and Samuel Williams challenge their sentences for distributing, or aiding, and abetting the distribution of, cocaine base, commonly known as “crack,” in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1988) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988).1 Each appellant ar*1561gues that the district court erred in attributing over 500 grams of cocaine base to him for sentencing purposes. Because the sentencing records do not establish the facts required to support the sentences, we vacate each appellant’s sentence and remand the cases to the district court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. James Michael WiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Thurnell Alston, Ervin BrennonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alejandro CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Hector AlmedinaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. John Dale Ramsdale, Charles ChristofersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Samuel Roman, A.K.A. Samuel Mercado Samuel Roman, United States of America v. Oscar Roman, A.K.A. Oscar MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.