Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Aultman, Miller & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1893No. 5066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Antelope county. Tried below before Powers, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action to enjoin a judgment. A demurrer was sustained to the amended petition, and the plaintiff not desiring to amend his petition the action was dismissed. The petition is as follows:

“ The plaintiff complains of the defendants for that on the 8th day of July, 1880, the defendant Aultman, Miller & Co. obtained three several judgments against the plaintiff in his absence, before Michael Costello, a justice of the peace in and for Holt county, Nebraska, copies of the record of which judgment are hereto attached, marked respectively Exhibits A, B, and C, and made a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sage v. HawleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  2. Blodgett v. UtleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. RoederNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Johnson v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Wittstruck v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. St. Paul Harvester Co. v. MahsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API