Legal Opinion

Wittstruck v. Temple

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1899No. 8738PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error, from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

It is sought by this proceeding to review an order of the court below reviving a dormant judgment. On June 1, 1881, Edward A. Temple obtained a judgment in the district court of Lancaster county against Frank G. Witt-struck for the sum of $248.98, and costs of suit. On motion of plaintiff', accompanied by the affidavit of his counsel, setting forth the recovery of the judgment for the sum stated above, and that the judgment had become dormant by the lapse of time, but was wholly unpaid, the court made a conditional oi'der of revivor, returnable in three days after service thereof, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. GaslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Enewold v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. SteinanNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Herron v. Cole Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ruth v. LowreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Lair v. De LairNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Furniture Co. v. AbramsNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Johnson v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rice v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. St. Paul Harvester Co. v. MahsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API