Wood v. Roeder
Nebraska Supreme Court
Objection by defendant in error to jurisdiction of supreme court on the ground that there was no legal service of summons in error.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is an objection by the defendant in error Roeder to the jurisdiction of this court on the ground that there was no legal service of the summons in error. It is conceded that a petition in error was filed herein within one year from the date of the judgment below, and that a summons was in due time issued for the defendant in error, directed to the sheriff of Douglas county, which was subsequently returned, showing service in due form by copy left at the usual place of residence of the defendant in error in said county. It is claimed in support of the objection that Roeder was not, at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dupuy v. . WurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- City of Hartford v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Blodgett v. UtleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
- Cobb v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Forbes v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walker v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Honeycutt v. NyquistWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Douglas County v. Estate of MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Vale v. School District of City of SuperiorNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Ex parte PettersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.