Hartung v. Bradbury
Oregon Supreme Court
(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Petitioners have filed original proceedings under Article IV, section 6(3), of the Oregon Constitution, challenging the validity of the plan of reapportionment of legislative districts prepared by the Secretary of State. All the petitions are consolidated for the purpose of this opinion. We grant the petition of Fabiano Petitioners, void the plan of reapportionment, and return the plan to the Secretary of State with directions. We dismiss all the other petitions. Or Const, Art IV, § 6(3).
The petitions before the court are:
S48792, Hartung et al. v. Bradbury (Hartung Petitioners);
S48827,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Redistricting Com'n Arizona IndependentArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Chavez v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.