Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Warren Winterhalder

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1983No. 83-1147PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying, in part, defendant’s motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant also seeks to bring a direct criminal appeal of his judgment of conviction based upon the district court’s order granting defendant an out-of-time appeal.

The question presently before this court is whether the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jerome Atilus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. David L. Mack v. William French Smith, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Eldon L. Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API