Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. L. Harvey & Son Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
In reference to tbe second assignment of error (tbe first having been abandoned) tbe plaintiff cites Ransom v. Shuler, 43 N. C., 304, as authority for tbe position tbat a motion to dissolve an injunction before tbe answer has been filed is premature. There an injunction was granted upon tbe bill and at tbe first term tbe defendant demurred for want of an equity; tbe demurrer was set down for argument at tbe next term and then tbe defendant’s counsel moved to dissolve tbe injunction. Tbe Court said, “There is an obvious inconsistency in such a course, for tbe motion to dissolve must be founded…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marshall v. Commissioners of Stanly CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Cobb v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Rigsbee v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Jones v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Bell v. DanzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farmers Cooperative Co. v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
- Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bowles v. Inland Empire Dairy Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
- Bishop v. Alabama Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926