Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1988No. D.D. No. 87-14PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. Respondent’s conduct, particularly with respect to Count I, however, requires a more severe sanction than that recommended. Such conduct undermines the integrity of the judicial system. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HartwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API