Legal Opinion

Rice v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1987No. 23, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

Maryland’s consolidated theft statute, Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol., 1986 Cum.Supp.) Article 27, §§ 340-344, enumerates in five subsections of § 342 alternate methods by which the crime of theft can be committed. 1 This

appeal presents the question whether a defendant, charged with theft, is entitled to a jury instruction that a conviction for this offense could not be obtained unless the jury agreed unanimously on all elements of at least one subsection of the statute. To resolve this question we must address issues both of the proper interpretation of the theft…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Andres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API