Spain v. Kelland

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellant was defendant in a suit for personal injuries. Plaintiff received, a verdict and judgment. Defendant complains’ of the refusal of the trial judge to direct a verdict at the end of plaintiff’s case, at the end of all the evidence, and in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto.

We must, therefore, view the evidence and all lawful inferences to be drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Neiman v. Jacobs, 87 Ariz. 44, 347 P.2d 702.

Defendant was the owner of a building in which plaintiff was…