In Re the Estate of Stitt
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.
Proponents of the will of Mary Stitt were granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict by the trial court. Contestants appeal.
The sole issue raised on this appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s action in rendering judgment contrary to the jury’s verdict. In this court, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the contestants, against whom judgment was rendered, and from that evidence, and the inferences reasonably and justifiably to be drawn therefrom, determine whether, under the law, the verdict for them can be sustained. Spain v. Kelland, 93…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hindmarch v. AngellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Spain v. KellandArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by18 opinions
- Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Tuscon Title Insurance Company v. D'AscoliArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Wagner v. Coronet HotelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Staheli v. KauffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Evans v. ListonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.