Doolin v. City of Winner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.
Ah action was brought by plaintiff against defendant city, to recover damages alleged and proven to have been suffered by plaintiff because of defective condition of defendant’s crossing and the negligent manner in which the crossing was maintained. Judgment was entered for plaintiff in the sum of $3,000. It is.from such judgment and order that this appeal is taken.
Plaintiff contends that on the 4th day of February, 1921, and for a period of time previous thereto, defendant, city of Winner, this state, maintained a crossing on a certain street in. a negligent manner; that near the south end…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Hall v. Incorporated TownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Taylor v. Mayor of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Sherlock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- McKarren v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BeltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008