Legal Opinion

Kruchinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1983No. Appeal, No. 139 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Kruchinsky appeals a Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board order affirming a termination of benefits. We affirm.

Kruchinsky, a commercial painter with Henry S. Baving, Inc., injured his feet in a fall from scaffolding. He received total disability benefits from September 16, 1974, until April 17, 1979, the date Baving filed a termination petition. The referee found that Kruchinsky had fully recovered and terminated his benefits.

Our. scope of review, where the party with the burden of proof has prevailed before the referee and the Board took no additional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schiavo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Leskin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Royster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Royster v. WCAB (NAT'L MINES CORP.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API