Legal Opinion

Royster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1986No. Appeal, No. 2982 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

James R. Royster, Petitioner, petitions for review of an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees order terminating Petitioners compensation. We affirm the Board.

Petitioner injured his right knee while in the course of his employment at National Mines Corporation (Employer) on January 27, 1981. As a result, Petitioner was totally disabled and began receiving workmens compensation benefits pursuant to a Notice of Compensation payable filed February 17, 1981. Petitioner was *340subsequently treated by Dr. Richard S. Gehl, who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Shepherd v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Bailey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Fashion Prints v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Frye v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. USX Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Chavis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Royster v. WCAB (NAT'L MINES CORP.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API