Legal Opinion

Leskin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1982No. Appeal, No. 2345 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION by

Judge Blatt,

Joseph Leskin (claimant) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s determination that he was no longer eligible for compensation because his disability had ceased.

On December 5,1977, the claimant sustained a com-pensable back injury while in the course of his employment with the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York (employer). On June 16, 1980, a petition to terminate was filed by his employer stating that the claimant was fully recovered and was able to return to his prior occupation as a deliveryman. Both sides…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Bailey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. K-Mart Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Underwear v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leskin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Boyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Kruchinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API