Legal Opinion

Rose v. Morrow

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit was brought to enforce the statutory liability of stockholders of the People’s (State) Bank of Spring-field, under chapter 54 of the Acts of 1909. The complainant sued on behalf of himself and all other depositors, alleging hot only insolvency, but an indebtedness to depositors in an aggregate amount in excess of all realizable assets, including the full amount of the double liability of the entire outstanding capital stock. The receiver was first joined as a complainant, but on the bearing bis name was withdrawn. Demurrers, in a common form, interposed on bebalf of all the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pfohl v. . SimpsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Queenan v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Wade v. PulsiferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
  4. Eames v. DorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Booth v. DearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wilkins v. JettonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Rose v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  4. Rose v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  5. Rose v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API