Legal Opinion

Baker v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 8, 2006No. 01 Civ. 5440(LAP)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PRESKA, District Judge.

Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc. (collectively “Urban”) inadvertently used a single photograph in which Kent Baker (“Baker”) claimed rights to an insert in 862 plastic picture frames. Upon being informed of Baker’s claims, Urban apologized for its mistake, voluntarily stopped selling the products at issue, and repeatedly offered Baker settlements in amounts that more than doubled the $3,896 in profit that it received from selling the picture frames. The decision of Baker and his counsel, Steven A. Weingrad, to pursue…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Dimension FilmsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  2. Rosenthal v. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Berry v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Silberstein v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Wang v. Bear Stearns Companies LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API