Albemarle Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANCEU, Chief Judge:
This consolidated action arose from judicial challenges to a final determination that the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) issued in an antidumping duty proceeding. 1 The contested determination (the “Final Results”) concluded the third administrative review of an antidumping duty order (the “Order”) on certain activated carbon (the “subject merchandise”) from the People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”). Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results ancj,.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Parkdale International v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Albemarle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Albemarle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016