Legal Opinion

Hoelscher v. Simmerock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1996No. WD 50903PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Dorothy Etta Hoelscher, Jeffrey A. Hoelscher, Linda Hoelscher and Nina Nord-wald (the “Hoelschers”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment which found Dean R. Sim-merock and Doris M. Simmerock entitled to an easement across the property of the Hoelschers. The Hoelschers contend that the trial court erred by failing to declare the easement void as a matter of law, because the deed purporting to grant the easement was ambiguous as to its purpose and location. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

In reviewing the judgment of a court-tried case, this court views the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Gilbert v. K.T.I., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Homan v. HutchisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Hamburg Realty Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Kelly v. SchmelzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Suffian v. UsherSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Grider v. TingleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Ridgway v. TTnT Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. American Quick Sign, Inc. v. ReinhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Maasen v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API