Legal Opinion
State v. Dean
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 27, 1968No. 2 CA-CR 123PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
APPEAL OF ROY LEE DEAN
Defendant Dean was convicted of petty theft, second offense, a felony, and this appeal is taken, not from the conviction itself, but from the application of the Arizona Recidivist Statute, A.R.S. § 13-1649, 5 A.R.S.
The prior conviction occurred on May 5, 1967, in the city court, City of Tucson, and at this time Dean pleaded guilty to and was convicted of petty theft. He was not represented by counsel at this time, and the city magistrate informed him that he had the right to have counsel present, but that the expense of providing counsel would be on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. McAlvainArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Hines v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- State v. PiperArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BrosieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.