Frandsen v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Proceedings by Bryan.. D. Roberts for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for injuries sustained while in the employ of Lars Frandsen. On writ of review by the employer to annul an order of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation.
1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.
The plaintiff, by writ of review herein, seeks the annulment of an order pf the defendant, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165), awarding compensation to Bryan D. Roberts for injuries sustained.
The facts of legal import are, in substance, as follows:'
In May, 1922, Lars Frandsen, the. plaintiff, was conducting a brickyard or kiln in or near Price, Utah. He sold a quan*356tity of brick to one Campbell for use at Helper, Utab. Frand-sen originally was to deliver the brick f. o. b. cars at Price to be transported by rail to Helper: The railroad switch being out of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Brown v. City of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
- Scotta v. O. A. Hankinson & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Nelson Morris & Co. v. MaloneIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Welch v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Vitagraph, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Costley v. Nevada Industrial Insurance CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Dallas County Pulpwood Co. v. StrangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975