Legal Opinion

Scotta v. O. A. Hankinson & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Frank W. Scott presented his claim for compensation against O. A. Hankinson, and others, copartners as 0. A. Hankinson & Company, for accidental injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendants and the Travelers’ Insurance Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

Certiorari to the industrial accident board. The sole question in this case is whether or *354not there was any evidence to support the finding of the industrial accident board that applicant was, at the time of the accident, in the employ of the respondent O. A. Hankinson & Company. The finding of the board is final (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5465) unless there was no competent legal evidence from which such fact might be found. See Reck v. Whittlesberger, 181 Mich. 463 (Ann. Cas. 1916C, 771); Kennelly v. Stearns Salt & Lumber Co., 190 Mich. 628.

O. A. Hankinson & Company, a copartnership composed of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reck v. WhittlesbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kennelly v. Stearns Salt & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Dahl v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Wilhelm v. Narregang-Hart Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lindsey v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Melhus v. Sam Johnson Sons Fisheries Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API