Legal Opinion
Richey v. Hammond Conservancy District
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 2015No. Docket 32,847PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAMORA, Judge.
The Opinion filed on October 15, 2014 is withdrawn, and the following Opinion is substituted in its place. ,
Plaintiff, Marshall Richey, appeals from the district court’s grant of Defendant’s motion to dismiss'for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 1-012(B)(6) NMRA. Plaintiff contends that the district court erred in concluding that the facts alleged in his amended complaint failed to state a claim within the exclusivity exception to the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), as recognized in Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality PontiacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Coates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Coleman v. Eddy Potash, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Delfino v. GriffoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradley v. AmazonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025