Union Water Development Co. v. Stevenson
District Court, N.D. California
At Law and in Equity. Actions by the Union Water Development Company against Elliott G. Stevenson and the Independent Girder of Foresters. On motions to quash service of process.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
These actions were filed in the state court on June 3, 1918, and on the same day summons in each was served on the defendant Stevenson under coincident circumstances. The cases were subsequently removed here, and Stevenson has inter*982posed the present motions to quash the service, on the ground that it was in both instances made in violation of his rights under the familiar and well-established doctrine that one from another state cannot competently be served with process in a civil action while temporarily within the state where service is had, in actual attendance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Burroughs v. Cocke & WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Roschynialski v. HaleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minch & Eisenbrey Co. v. CramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. SperbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Miller v. Minerals Separation Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1921
- Morse-Koob, Inc. v. Milner Export & Trading Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1950
- Lawlor v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.