Legal Opinion

Minch & Eisenbrey Co. v. Cram

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 18, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Durey, J.).

1Opinion of the Court

Stookbridck, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mrs. Lucille Cram formerly lived in the City of Baltimore in one of the large apartment houses. While so located she-purchased from Minch & Eisenbrey furniture to- the amount of $1,064.43, as appears- from the account filed with the narr. in this- case.

Subsequently her furniture, including most or all of that so bought from Minch and Eisenbrey, was taken by the- managers of the apartment, under color of law, and Mrs. Oram not long thereafter left Baltimore, and s-o- far as the Record discloses has not had since- a definite- place of residence.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Bishop v. VoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  3. Mullen v. SanbornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  4. In re HealeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
  5. Diamond v. EarleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brainard v. Dist. Court of Eighth Judicial District Ex Rel. Natrona CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Feuster v. RedshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Neel v. Webb Fly Screen Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Franklin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. J. & H. STABLES, INC. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API