Miller v. Minerals Separation Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
At Law. Action by John H. Miller against the Minerals Separation Limited and others. On motions by certain defendants to quash service of summons and dismiss as to such defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
These are motions to quash service of summons and dismiss the action as to certain of the defendants. The action is one to recover damages resulting from the breach of an alleged contract to employ plaintiff as an attorney at law in certain patent infringement litigation involving a process of ore concentration by air froth flotation. It proceeds against four corporations named as defendants, the first three, namely, Minerals Separation Limited, Minerals Separation American Syndicate Limited, Minerals Separation American Syndicate (1913) Limited, being British…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Andrew Jergens Co. v. Bonded Products Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Murphy v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
- Aeroil Burner Co. v. LittlefordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926