United States v. Villard
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
' OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This opinion addresses the novel issue of whether a defendant was properly convicted of transporting child pornography across state lines, where the jury did not have the benefit of viewing the visual depictions in question. To paraphrase an old adage, this court must decide whether somewhat less than a thousand words (in the form of testimony by a government witness) can take the place of a picture.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 3, 1987, a federal Grand Jury indicted Robert David Villard on three counts. Count One alleged that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DostDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1986
- United States v. Edwin E. WiegandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, Juan Martinez, Jaime B. Salcedo, United States of America v. Manuel Suarez-O'neillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. RodriguezTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Tennessee v. Fred Chad Clark, IITennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. Robert David VillardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.