Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 10, 2003No. 49883-5-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

The State charged Morning Mills with felony harassment. The crime of misdemeanor harassment is elevated to a felony when a jury finds the defendant threatened to kill his or her victim. In this case, the to-convict instruction contained all the elements of harassment, as defined by statute. A special verdict instruction and accompanying form were used to instruct the jury to decide, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether or not Mills threatened to kill her victim. After the jury found her guilty *108of harassment, it also found that she had threatened to kill the victim. She was therefore convicted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. AumickWashington Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HaywardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. HaywardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. TealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API