Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. American General Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1989No. 08-89-00153-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING ON GRANTING OF APPELLANT’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORDS

KOEHLER, Justice.

From an order granting Appellant’s Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record on appeal by allowing the late filing of a statement of facts, the Appellee moved for rehearing. Rehearing was granted. As a result, the prior order is set aside and Appellant’s motion to supplement the records is denied.

The final order or judgment dismissing this case for want of jurisdiction was signed on February 24,1989. A Motion for Rehearing was heard and denied on March 17. Appellate bond for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Odom v. Olafson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Adams v. HR Management and La Plaza, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  3. Monk v. Dallas Brake and Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. Caldwell & Hurst v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Peart v. Marr's Short Stops, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Tech/III, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. Railroad Commission v. Belknap Van & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API