Legal Opinion

Monk v. Dallas Brake and Clutch Service Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 18, 1984No. 05-84-00788-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING STATEMENT OF FACTS

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

FOR FILING STATEMENT OF FACTS

Appellants moved to extend the time for filing the statement of facts. We granted the motion on the ground that appellants reasonably explained their delay in requesting the reporter to begin preparation of the statement of facts. Appellee Dallas Brake and Clutch Service Company, Inc. now moves to reconsider our ruling and to strike the statement of facts, contending that we have no discretion to extend the time for filing a statement of facts unless a written request is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Odom v. Olafson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Moore v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howell v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Inman's Corp. v. Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Adams v. HR Management and La Plaza, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  4. Caldwell & Hurst v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Container Port Services, Inc. v. Gage, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API