Legal Opinion
Vaughn v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 17, 1989No. 86 Civ. 5257 (JMW)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WALKER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Dorothy Vaughn (“Vaughn”) and Josephine Sanchez Johnson (“Sanchez Johnson”) allege that Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) discriminated against them on account of their race and age, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York Human Rights Law § 296 subd. 1(a). Defendant Mobil moves for summary judgment, requesting that this Court: (1) dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on the grounds that plaintiffs have failed to sustain their burdens of proof and/or on the ground that the claims asserted therein…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thomas Taggart v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Eugene F. MARESCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVANS CHEMETICS, DIV. of W.R. GRACE & CO., Defendants AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Preuss v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Medwid v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Cronin v. ITT CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.