Legal Opinion

Trejo v. California Forensic Medical Group

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 1, 2024No. 3:20-cv-01465Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSE TREJO, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-1465-DDL 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE EXPERT TESTIMONY 12 v. 13 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL 14 GROUP, 15 Defendant. 16 17 During the ongoing trial in this case, both parties have presented witness testimony 18 under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Plaintiffs called Tim Gravette and Nichole Johnson, 19 M.D., and Defendant called Kimberly Pearson, R.N. Other than an issue regarding an 20 aspect of Pearson’s testimony that the Court resolved prior to trial, neither side objected to 21…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Boyd v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Billfloat Inc. v. Collins Cash Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API