Legal Opinion

Ex Parte George Eason

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1929No. A-7634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner in substance alleges that he is restrained by the sheriff of Craig county in the county jail and that said restraint is without authority of law; that petitioner was charged with robbery by firearms before the county judge of said county, sitting as á magistrate. A preliminary examination was had, and the principal evidence against petitioner was the testimony of an accomplice; that there was no sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice to show sufficient cause. It is admitted before this court that the crime of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re OxleyNevada Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McCurdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Ex Parte BurroughsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Ex Parte PatmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Castro v. GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
  2. Ex Parte PresnellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Application of ErvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Ex Parte SchrackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Castro v. GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API